Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Agentic AI in the Enterprise: Adoption Strategies, Security, and the Road Ahead

General Report June 13, 2025
goover

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Defining Agentic AI and Its Evolution
  2. Enterprise Adoption Landscape and Use Cases
  3. Security and Governance in Agentic AI Deployments
  4. Building Scalable and Impactful AI Agents
  5. Challenges, Myths, and Industry Perspectives
  6. Future Outlook and Strategic Opportunities
  7. Conclusion

1. Summary

  • The emergence of agentic AI marks a pivotal transformation within the landscape of artificial intelligence, evolving from conventional reactive systems to intelligent, autonomous agents capable of self-direction and goal attainment. As of June 2025, global enterprises are in various stages of adopting these advanced technologies, particularly in regions such as Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), India, and the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. In ANZ, 36% of IT security teams have integrated agentic AI tools, with projections indicating a rise to 68% within two years as organizations recognize their potential to enhance security, streamline operations, and drive productivity. In India, nearly half of enterprises are piloting these AI solutions, marking a significant shift from traditional automation toward intelligent systems that enhance responsiveness and decision-making capabilities across various business functions. Key industries are leveraging agentic AI to improve talent acquisition in HR, optimize IT service management, and enhance customer engagement, thereby underscoring its versatility and transformative impact across sectors.

  • Moreover, market projections suggest robust growth for agentic AI solutions in the coming years, with Gartner forecasting that guardian agents will constitute a significant portion of the agentic AI market by 2030. This urgency is echoed in the sentiments of IT leaders, as a substantial percentage acknowledge the critical role of AI agents in maintaining competitive advantages. Despite the promising advancements, the deployment of agentic AI is not without challenges. Security risks associated with these systems are prevalent; common vulnerabilities include input manipulation and data integrity breaches. To address these concerns, the role of governance frameworks and regulatory considerations is becoming increasingly crucial, ensuring organizations establish responsible practices amidst rising autonomous capabilities.

  • As enterprises engage with the complexities of integrating agentic AI, they are guided by emerging best practices from leaders such as Salesforce and Google Cloud, which highlight the importance of strategic investment pathways and clear ROI metrics. These insights encourage organizations to embrace a dispelling approach to myths surrounding AI adoption, recognizing that successful implementation necessitates thoughtful planning, governance, and an understanding of AI's strategic value. Overall, the rapid acceleration of agentic AI adoption signals a transformative era for businesses, positioning them to leverage technology for sustainable growth and innovation.

2. Defining Agentic AI and Its Evolution

  • 2-1. From reactive chatbots to autonomous decision-making systems

  • Agentic AI is fundamentally transforming the landscape of artificial intelligence by evolving from traditional, reactive systems—such as chatbots—to sophisticated autonomous decision-making entities. Traditional AI models primarily function as reactive tools that respond to user inputs without the capacity for independent thought or longitudinal planning. In contrast, Agentic AI systems are characterized by their ability to autonomously assess situations, set long-term goals, plan their courses of action, and make decisions based on dynamically changing environments. This shift not only enhances operational efficiency but also enables AI systems to deliver more personalized and nuanced interactions. For instance, Agentic AI systems are now capable of managing complex tasks across various domains, such as financial services and retail, thereby significantly augmenting productivity and responsiveness.

  • Recent advancements have led to the development of AI agents capable of operating across multiple applications, as highlighted by OpenAI's introduction of 'AI Agents' that execute tasks such as travel booking and report generation. These advancements underscore the transition from passive AI systems to self-directed agents embodying a new era of autonomy in technology. The implications of this evolution reach far beyond mere task execution, suggesting a future where machines can make complex decisions with minimal human intervention, radically altering workflows and human-AI interactions.

  • 2-2. Core characteristics of agentic AI architectures

  • The core characteristics of Agentic AI architectures include autonomy, goal-oriented behavior, and the capacity for learning and adaptation. Autonomy enables these AI systems to perform tasks independently, freeing human operators from routine operatives and allowing for dynamic decision-making. They are designed to function in environments where they can not only execute tasks but also learn from their experiences, refine their approaches, and adapt their strategies in pursuit of specific objectives. As noted by experts, Agentic AI systems are structured to engage in iterative planning and reasoning, making them capable of complex problem-solving in real-time, which is a notable shift from traditional linear AI systems that follow preset scripts.

  • These architectures often integrate advanced capabilities such as real-time data processing, contextual analysis, and multi-layered feedback mechanisms. For example, financial institutions leveraging Agentic AI can automate compliance checks while simultaneously analyzing market conditions, allowing for proactive risk management. The design principles of such architectures are critical as enterprises begin to implement these systems, highlighting the importance of governance frameworks that document AI decision-making processes and maintain ethical standards amidst increasing autonomy.

  • 2-3. Distinction from traditional AI models

  • Agentic AI stands in stark contrast to traditional AI models, primarily through its degree of autonomy and complexity of operations. Traditional AI models, such as rule-based systems or simple chatbots, typically function under well-defined conditions, responding to stimuli without any capacity for initiative beyond their programmed responses. On the other hand, Agentic AI represents a paradigm shift, where the focus is on self-direction and intent-driven functionalities. These systems utilize sophisticated algorithms to understand context, anticipate needs, and execute actions that align with overarching goals without requiring continuous human input.

  • Furthermore, the distinction is also apparent in operational breadth; while traditional AI systems might handle singular tasks—like answering customer queries—Agentic AI systems can navigate multi-faceted situations, integrating inputs from various data streams and responding comprehensively. For example, an AI equipped with Agentic architecture could not only suggest products based on customer behavior but also autonomously adjust inventory models and marketing strategies to maximize sales outcomes. This multifaceted capacity is what positions Agentic AI as a pivotal innovation in the automation landscape, promising significant impacts on various industries as they adopt these advanced systems.

3. Enterprise Adoption Landscape and Use Cases

  • 3-1. Regional adoption trends in ANZ, India, and APAC

  • As of June 2025, the adoption of agentic AI has seen significant progress across various regions, particularly in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), India, and the broader Asia-Pacific (APAC) area. In ANZ, recent research has indicated that 36% of IT security teams are currently utilizing agentic AI tools for daily operations, with this figure expected to rise to 68% within the next two years as enterprises increasingly recognize the technology's potential to enhance security and operational efficiency. A growing 71% of organizations in the region are planning to boost their security budgets, underscoring a commitment to integrating advanced AI solutions into their frameworks.

  • In India, the landscape is shifting rapidly, with nearly half of Indian enterprises piloting agentic AI solutions. According to an IDC report, this transition marks a pivotal evolution in enterprise strategies, moving from rule-based process automation toward intelligent, context-aware systems. Key industries are leveraging agentic AI across various sectors like IT operations, HR, finance, and customer engagement to enhance responsiveness and scalability. The move signifies a shift that is not merely technological but also cultural, as companies begin to understand the broader implications of integrating AI into the workforce and daily operations. The APAC region is experiencing swift uptake; countries like Indonesia report that 92% of knowledge workers are already using generative AI tools, paving the way for agentic AI to revolutionize enterprise functions further. A Boston Consulting Group report highlighted that the ASEAN region surpasses other areas in AI adoption, clearly indicating that this part of the world is at the forefront of utilizing AI-driven solutions for enhancing productivity and engagement within the workspace.

  • 3-2. Key enterprise use cases and pilot programs

  • Various use cases for agentic AI are emerging as organizations begin to experiment and deploy pilot programs across different sectors. Notably in HR, agentic AI systems are being experimented with for automated talent acquisition, which involves sourcing candidates, assessing resumes, scheduling interviews, and conducting preliminary screenings—all while ensuring compliance with employment laws and diversity policies. This represents a significant departure from traditional AI, which only assisted with specific tasks under direct human supervision. Instead, agentic AI is designed to function autonomously, thereby freeing human employees to concentrate on strategic initiatives rather than day-to-day administrative tasks.

  • In addition to HR functions, agentic AI is increasingly being employed in IT service management, where it enhances decision-making through real-time data analytics. Enterprises are beginning to explore the potential of AI agents in other areas such as customer service, where these systems can autonomously interact with customers to resolve issues or answer questions without human intervention. This capability not only increases the customer engagement potential but also reduces the workload on human staff, making it easier for them to focus on more complex inquiries that require human empathy and understanding. Furthermore, industries such as telecommunications are adopting agentic AI to streamline operations, with AI agents assisting in fraud detection and other business support systems. The immediate feedback loop of AI ensures rapid adaptation to changing circumstances, something that static or traditional systems struggle to achieve.

  • 3-3. Market projections for agentic AI deployments

  • Market projections for agentic AI suggest robust growth over the next few years. According to Gartner, it is anticipated that guardian agents, which ensure the security and reliability of AI applications, will constitute 10-15% of the agentic AI market by 2030. The urgency surrounding the adoption of these AI systems is underscored by a recent poll indicating that among 147 CIOs and IT leaders, 24% reported having implemented a few AI agents, with a further 4% having deployed more than a dozen. In contrast, 50% are still experimenting with their technologies and 17% plan to adopt them by the end of 2026, indicating a rapidly maturing market.

  • Future forecasts also indicate that approximately one-third of software applications within enterprises are projected to integrate agentic AI by 2028, significantly up from less than 1% in 2024. The sentiment among IT leaders is overwhelmingly positive, with 83% considering AI agents critical for maintaining a competitive edge. This suggests a strong inclination within the market toward embracing AI, where nearly 96% of businesses are planning to expand their AI deployments significantly in the near term. As enterprises look to enhance their capabilities and streamline operations, the shift toward agentic AI will likely redefine how businesses perceive and utilize technology in their daily functions.

4. Security and Governance in Agentic AI Deployments

  • 4-1. Emerging security risks with agentic AI

  • The proliferation of agentic AI systems within enterprises has brought about significant concerns regarding security risks. As organizations increasingly adopt AI agents for various operational roles, new vulnerabilities have emerged that necessitate heightened attention. According to recent findings by Gartner, typical threats include input manipulation, data poisoning, and credential hijacking. Input manipulation refers to instances where corrupt data could lead to erroneous conclusions drawn by AI agents, impacting decision-making processes and overall enterprise operations. Alongside these risks, the interaction of AI agents with malicious websites amplifies concerns regarding data integrity. This reinforces the need for robust security measures, as compromised data inputs can lead to significant operational disruptions. As the deployment of multi-agent systems increases, so does the complexity of potential risks. Gartner emphasizes that traditional oversight mechanisms may no longer suffice, highlighting the urgent requirement for automated solutions to manage these emerging threats effectively.

  • 4-2. Role and forecast of guardian agents by Gartner

  • In response to the growing security challenges associated with agentic AI, Gartner anticipates that 'guardian agents' will play a pivotal role in mitigating risk and ensuring safer AI deployment within enterprises. Designed to function as both AI assistants and monitoring entities, these guardian agents will account for 10 to 15% of the entire agentic AI market by 2030. Guardian agents can fulfill multiple roles: they assist in content review for accuracy, monitor AI actions for compliance, and possess the capability to intervene by redirecting or blocking actions that deviate from pre-established goals. Data from Gartner’s recent polls indicate that CIOs and IT leaders recognize the importance of deploying these agents, with 24% of surveyed leaders having already implemented a limited number of AI agents. An additional 50% are actively exploring the adoption of this technology, underscoring the increasing importance of guardian agents as critical components in the governance structure of AI systems.

  • 4-3. Developing regulatory frameworks and AI law considerations

  • The regulatory landscape for agentic AI is evolving, particularly with the ongoing development of frameworks designed to define clear operational standards for AI providers. For example, recent drafts for AI legislation in Thailand signal a proactive approach to ensure all AI developers operate under consistent and accountable guidelines. These frameworks emphasize the importance of safety standards, data management requirements, and establishing risk levels related to personal data processing. Particularly important in these discussions is the notion that AI should be treated as a tool that retains a human responsibility for its actions. This aligns with global best practices which aim to balance innovation with ethical considerations and public safety. As such, enterprises utilizing AI must also prepare for compliance with new regulations, ensuring that their operational practices reflect both safety and accountability.

5. Building Scalable and Impactful AI Agents

  • 5-1. Structured investment pathways and ROI tracking

  • In the landscape of AI deployments, many enterprises face the challenge of ensuring that their AI investments yield substantial returns. A significant percentage of AI initiatives have, in fact, stalled due to poor data quality, inadequate risk management, and a lack of clearly defined business value. Research shows that approximately 30% of enterprise generative AI projects are currently expected to stall in 2025, underscoring the critical need for structured investment pathways and effective return on investment (ROI) tracking. To combat this issue, organizations are encouraged to move beyond aimless experimentation and adopt strategic funding decisions grounded in clear, measurable outputs. According to insights from recent reports, the AI ROI Framework has emerged as a crucial tool to assess and track AI projects effectively, allowing organizations to monitor progress from inception to full-scale implementation. This framework includes evaluating technical feasibility and adoption readiness, ensuring that AI initiatives can not only launch successfully but also scale to deliver meaningful impact.

  • Moreover, companies are advised to take a dual-path approach towards their investment strategies. One of these approaches focuses on building 'AI readiness' across the organization by investing in employee training, governance structures, and access to AI tools. This encourages internal innovation and enables the workforce to engage with AI technologies effectively. The alternative is a use-case-driven strategy, concentrating on identifying high-value AI applications that have immediate business relevance. Each approach has its own benefits and challenges, demonstrating the necessity of a thoughtful, discerning strategy for AI investment that leads to impactful outcomes.

  • 5-2. Portfolio-based funding strategies

  • As organizations dive deeper into AI, adopting a portfolio-based funding strategy is vital for navigating the increasing risks associated with AI projects. This approach, akin to managing an investment portfolio, allows companies to distribute their investments across varying types of AI initiatives—core, adjacent, and transformational. By diversifying funding, enterprises can balance short-term efficiency gains while preparing for long-term transformative impacts. The need for such diversification is underscored by prominent voices in the industry, including IBM and Salesforce, who emphasize the importance of structured investments that can address both immediate operational improvements and strategic market opportunities.

  • Strategically, this means prioritizing certain projects that show strong potential and allocating funds accordingly to ensure a healthy mix of initiatives. The governance of these funds becomes crucial, allowing firms to reassess the effectiveness of their investments continuously. Organizations must be prepared to pivot away from underperforming projects while doubling down on successful ventures, thereby ensuring that resources are optimally allocated to high-impact projects. The end goal is to prevent wasted expenditures and leverage AI to create new business models and market offerings that enhance competitive advantage.

  • 5-3. Best practices from Salesforce, Google Cloud, IBM, and Microsoft

  • Leading companies in the AI space have demonstrated best practices that contribute significantly to building scalable and impactful AI agents. Salesforce, for Instance, has experienced substantial benefits through its Agentforce initiative, which streamlines various customer-facing operations. With the deployment of AI agents, Salesforce reported impressive metrics, including an 85% resolution rate of customer queries with minimal human intervention. This showcases how effective integration of AI can lead to significant operational efficiencies.

  • Similarly, Google Cloud's approach to agentic AI, as discussed at the AI Summit London, highlights practical applications like the Waymo autonomous vehicles, which represent real-world deployments of AI agents capable of navigating complex environments. The integration of such AI agents in sectors as critical as healthcare—with projects like AlphaFold for protein folding—demonstrates the scalability potential of AI in driving transformational change.

  • IBM's focus on creating an 'agentic enterprise' through its watsonx platform consolidates various AI capabilities, allowing businesses to deploy agents across multiple existing systems. This type of comprehensive integration is essential for scaling AI effectively within organizations. Furthermore, clear governance measures to oversee AI implementations ensure that risks are managed while fostering a robust experimentation culture that supports innovative AI solutions. By analyzing these best practices, other enterprises can glean valuable insights and strategies that facilitate the successful integration of AI agents across various business functions.

6. Challenges, Myths, and Industry Perspectives

  • 6-1. Five common myths hindering adoption

  • The conversation surrounding agentic AI often becomes muddied by persistent myths that hinder its adoption in organizations. One prominent myth is that agentic AI is merely a tool to fine-tune existing processes. In actuality, agentic AI signifies a transformative shift where businesses must rethink their operational strategies entirely. It's not just about making incremental improvements, but rather about redefining how organizations set objectives, plan workflows, execute tasks, and adapt to changes in the environment. This fundamental shift opens up unprecedented opportunities for innovation and growth, which organizations may overlook if they fail to recognize the strategic value of agentic systems.

  • Another prevalent myth is the notion that agentic AI can be deployed without undergoing any redesign of existing processes. Successfully integrating agentic AI necessitates a comprehensive reevaluation of business workflows to genuinely unlock its potential value. Instead of simply integrating new technology, it’s imperative to align organizational processes with the capabilities of agentic systems to ensure maximum effectiveness.

  • A frequent misconception is the expectation that agentic AI will allow for a 'fully hands-off' approach, eliminating the need for any human oversight. However, while agentic AI enhances autonomy, it does not remove the necessity for human governance and oversight. Organizations must design systems that ensure accountability and structured human-machine collaboration, where humans steer AI-driven initiatives rather than relinquishing control altogether.

  • Moreover, many organizations erroneously assume that agentic AI is mainly suited for operational use cases, confining its application to lower-level functions like task automation and customer support. In fact, agentic AI's diverse applications extend far beyond mere operational tasks, encompassing areas such as strategic planning, marketing, and customer experience enhancement. Companies that fail to recognize this risk missing out on substantial competitive advantages and transformative outcomes.

  • Finally, there is a prevailing misunderstanding that agentic AI will yield immediate ROI. In truth, the journey to realizing the benefits of agentic AI is gradual and often complex. Realizing value requires a planned and staged implementation, focusing on long-term alignment with organizational goals rather than chasing quick wins. Companies need to understand that true ROI emerges from sustained effort in optimizing deployment strategies and refining processes over time.

  • 6-2. Critiques and feedback from leading researchers

  • Research discussions surrounding AI often invite scrutiny, as evidenced by critiques from respected figures in the field such as Gary Marcus. His reflections on the current limitations of AI echo a broader sentiment that critical assessment is necessary for progress. The recent papers published by Apple’s AI team, detailing specific failures in reasoning capabilities within large AI models, embody the vital need for an honest evaluation of existing technologies. These findings highlight areas where AI systems still struggle, particularly in reasoning tasks that are intuitive to humans but pose considerable challenges to current models.

  • Marcus advocates for recognizing these limitations not as setbacks, but as springboards for innovation. The juxtaposition of AI's abilities against its shortcomings provides a roadmap for future enhancements, suggesting that combining traditional neural networks with symbolic reasoning could bridge the current gaps. This perspective emphasizes that the act of questioning and critiquing AI systems is not detrimental; rather, it is a critical contributor to advancing AI technologies.

  • Furthermore, constructive criticism has historically demonstrated value in driving the evolution of technology. Instances where limitations were identified have led to breakthroughs in training methodologies and system design, ultimately making AI solutions more robust and reliable. The connection between critical feedback and innovation within AI affirms that maintaining a youthful curiosity toward technological limitations fuels growth and advancement in the field.

  • 6-3. Balancing hype with practical implementation challenges

  • The landscape of agentic AI is rife with enthusiastic discussions, yet there exists a palpable imbalance between the hype surrounding its capabilities and the realities of practical implementation. This disparity is significant, as it can lead organizations to adopt technologies without a grounded understanding of their actual capabilities and limitations. Each advancement in AI generates excitement, sometimes overshadowing the crucial groundwork required for successful deployment.

  • Organizations often encounter several challenges when transitioning to agentic systems, from technological integration hurdles to resistance within teams accustomed to conventional workflows. The challenge of ensuring seamless integration with existing systems is compounded by the necessity for thorough training and adjustment periods. Without recognizing these practical challenges, the ambitious goals set for agentic AI can quickly become misaligned with organizational realities.

  • Thus, while enthusiasm for agentic AI should be encouraged, it is equally important for organizations to approach deployment with a tempered perspective, ensuring that they are grounded in objective assessments of both opportunities and hurdles. A balanced perspective will not only facilitate smoother implementation but also cultivate a culture of informed decision-making that promotes sustainable growth and scalability within enterprises.

7. Future Outlook and Strategic Opportunities

  • 7-1. Roadmap for enterprises to mature their agentic AI capabilities

  • For enterprises aiming to leverage agentic AI, a strategic roadmap is essential. This includes fostering a culture of experimentation with AI technologies, investing in robust training and upskilling programs for employees, and implementing a governance structure that includes guardian agents to monitor and manage AI activities effectively. Notably, companies are encouraged to adopt portfolio-based funding strategies to ensure that investments in AI lead to measurable ROI, which in turn supports the scaling of impactful AI initiatives.

  • Moreover, enterprises should prioritize collaboration among departments to establish cross-functional teams that oversee AI deployment and maintenance. This approach ensures that various business areas can leverage the capabilities of agentic AI while remaining compliant with emerging regulations, thus paving the way for a more integrated and responsible application of AI technologies in future operational landscapes.

Conclusion

  • In summary, agentic AI stands as a transformative force that is advancing the evolution of technological systems from reactive to autonomous, goal-driven entities that can fundamentally reshape how enterprises operate. As of June 2025, the integration of these intelligent systems continues to gain momentum, with organizations recognizing their potential for enhancing productivity and responsiveness in various functions. The emergence of structured investment strategies and clear metrics for return on investment (ROI) will play a pivotal role in encouraging further adoption, enabling businesses to monitor and capitalize on the benefits derived from agentic AI technologies. Security and governance remain paramount concerns, with guardian agents emerging as a crucial mechanism for maintaining control and oversight as enterprises navigate the complexities of deploying these advanced solutions.

  • As organizations continue to dispel myths about agentic AI and learn from industry leaders like Salesforce and Google Cloud, they are positioned to tackle integration challenges effectively. The need for a strategic roadmap that balances innovation with security and compliance becomes increasingly clear, especially in light of evolving regulatory frameworks. Looking ahead, enterprises are urged to focus on establishing cross-functional AI governance teams, embracing portfolio-based investment strategies, and piloting guardian agents to navigate the path to trustworthy autonomy in AI deployments. These proactive steps will not only ensure sustainable impact but also set the stage for a new era of intelligent enterprise practices well into the future.

Glossary

  • Agentic AI: Agentic AI refers to autonomous, self-directed systems capable of making decisions and taking actions based on their goals and learned experiences. Unlike traditional AI, which reacts to inputs, agentic AI operates independently, adapting to changes in its environment to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
  • AI agents: AI agents are software entities that perform tasks on behalf of users, leveraging AI capabilities to execute actions autonomously. These agents can interact with data and perform complex operations across various applications, marking a shift from passive systems to proactive participants in business processes.
  • Guardian agents: Guardian agents are specialized AI systems designed to monitor and oversee the actions of agentic AI to ensure compliance with ethical and operational standards. They are expected to account for 10-15% of the agentic AI market by 2030, acting as a critical control mechanism in AI deployments.
  • ROI (Return on Investment): ROI measures the profitability of an investment, indicating how much return is generated relative to the investment cost. In the context of AI, structured tracking of ROI is essential for justifying expenditures and ensuring that AI initiatives deliver meaningful business value.
  • Digital transformation: Digital transformation involves the integration of digital technologies into all aspects of a business, fundamentally changing how it operates and delivers value to customers. It's a crucial process as enterprises adopt agentic AI, necessitating shifts in culture, operations, and strategy.
  • Security risks: Security risks related to agentic AI include vulnerabilities such as input manipulation, data poisoning, and credential hijacking. Organizations must be aware of these threats as they increase the complexity and potential impact of AI deployments within enterprise systems.
  • Investment strategies: Investment strategies in AI focus on determining how financial resources are allocated toward various AI initiatives. Organizations are encouraged to adopt structured, portfolio-based funding strategies that balance immediate returns with long-term transformative potential.
  • Myths about AI: Myths about AI, such as its ability to operate without human oversight or that it only enhances existing processes, can impede its adoption. Understanding these misconceptions is vital for organizations to leverage the true capabilities of agentic AI effectively.
  • Gartner: Gartner is a leading research and advisory company that provides insights and analysis on technology trends, including the evolving landscape of AI. Their forecasts and recommendations are influential in shaping how enterprises approach AI adoption and governance.
  • AI law: AI law encompasses the legal frameworks and regulations governing the deployment and use of artificial intelligence technologies. It addresses issues such as accountability, data privacy, and ethical considerations, ensuring responsible development and implementation of AI systems.
  • Portfolio strategy: A portfolio strategy in AI investment involves diversifying funding across various projects, allowing organizations to manage risks better and pursue a mix of short-term improvements and long-term innovations. This strategic approach is essential for maximizing the impact of AI initiatives.
  • Autonomy in AI: Autonomy in AI refers to the ability of AI systems to operate independently, making decisions and executing actions without human intervention. This quality characterizes agentic AI and distinguishes it from traditional AI models that require continuous human input.
  • Regulatory considerations: Regulatory considerations pertain to the legal and compliance aspects relevant to the implementation of AI. As AI technologies evolve, enterprises face the challenge of aligning their practices with emerging regulations that ensure safety, accountability, and ethical standards.
  • Market forecasts: Market forecasts provide projections regarding the expected growth and trends of specific technologies, including agentic AI. These predictions inform organizations about the competitive landscape and help in strategic planning for future investments in AI.

Source Documents