Your browser does not support JavaScript!

The Economic Toll of Biodiversity Loss: Threats to Global Economies and Jobs

General Report June 21, 2025
goover

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Understanding Biodiversity Loss: Status and Drivers
  2. Economic and Financial Risks of Biodiversity Loss
  3. Poverty, Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Interactions
  4. Sectoral Impacts: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
  5. Policy and Multi-Stakeholder Responses
  6. Mitigation and Opportunities: The Role of Circular Economy
  7. Conclusion

1. Summary

  • The ongoing crisis of biodiversity loss transcends mere environmental degradation; it represents a daunting economic challenge with vast implications for global stability and development. By June 2025, the economic ramifications have become increasingly pronounced, with estimates suggesting that global GDP could face a staggering risk of up to $44 trillion, primarily linked to the deterioration of ecosystem services vital for food production, healthcare, and raw materials. This complex interplay between biodiversity depletion and economic health is particularly salient among vulnerable communities, especially those reliant on agriculture, forestry, and fisheries, where millions of livelihoods are threatened.

  • As the world confronts these challenges, the current state of biodiversity loss reflects dire trends—approximately 1 million species are on the brink of extinction due to critical drivers such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change. Regions like tropical forests and coral reefs are experiencing up to an 80% loss in species diversity, posing severe risks to ecological balance and human health. Acknowledging the intrinsic link between ecosystem health and socio-economic viability, the discourse is evolving towards recognizing the substantial role of biodiversity in economic frameworks, urging policymakers and businesses alike to incorporate these crucial elements into their operational strategies.

  • The interplay between environmental degradation and poverty also garners attention, particularly in semi-arid and rural areas where biodiversity loss can exacerbate existing economic vulnerabilities. Effective spatial management and targeted conservation initiatives are thus essential for not only safeguarding biodiversity but also lifting communities out of poverty. By integrating systematic efforts to improve both ecological integrity and socio-economic conditions, stakeholders can make strides towards sustainable development that benefits all.

  • Amidst these challenges, awareness and recognition of biodiversity loss are gaining traction on the global stage. Initiatives such as the International Day for Biological Diversity and frameworks like the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework underscore a collective commitment to reversing these trends by the year 2050. The emphasis on stakeholder collaboration highlights the necessity for a unified approach in enhancing understanding and action toward preserving our planet's biodiversity while cultivating sustainable practices that align economic goals with ecological stewardship.

2. Understanding Biodiversity Loss: Status and Drivers

  • 2-1. Current scope of species decline

  • As of June 2025, biodiversity loss has reached alarming levels, with the current extinction rate estimated to be between 1, 000 to 10, 000 times higher than the natural background rate. The United Nations reports that around 1 million plant and animal species are facing the threat of extinction, particularly in ecologically significant regions such as tropical forests and coral reefs. Habitat destruction, primarily due to agricultural expansion and urban development, has decimated natural habitats, resulting in an 80% loss of biodiversity in these areas. Moreover, substantial alterations to terrestrial (75%) and marine (66%) ecosystems have been documented, exacerbating the crisis. This species decline poses significant risks not only to ecological balance but also to human health, as biodiversity is integral to the provision of ecosystem services that directly impact food security, medicine, and overall human well-being.

  • 2-2. Primary drivers of biodiversity loss

  • The primary drivers contributing to biodiversity loss encompass habitat destruction, climate change, and pollution. Habitat destruction, primarily driven by deforestation and land conversion for agriculture, is a leading cause of species extinction. Urbanization and the expansion of infrastructure further fragment ecosystems, isolating species and diminishing their chances of survival. Climate change disrupts species distributions and phenology, forcing organisms to adapt rapidly or face declining populations. Additionally, pollution from industrial, agricultural, and urban sources introduces harmful chemicals into ecosystems, negatively impacting flora and fauna alike. Notably, pesticides have been linked to significant declines in pollinator populations, which are crucial for global food supply. As articulated by the UN Secretary-General António Guterres, short-term economic interests often overshadow the long-term sustainability of biodiversity.

  • 2-3. Global recognition and awareness

  • In recent years, there has been an increasing global recognition of biodiversity loss as a critical issue affecting humans and ecosystems alike. The United Nations holds the International Day for Biological Diversity on May 22 every year to raise awareness and encourage global action. The theme for the year 2025, 'Harmony With Nature and Sustainable Development, ' reflects a concerted effort to align biodiversity preservation with sustainable practices. The adoption of international frameworks, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, aims to set ambitious targets for reversing biodiversity decline by 2050. The framework seeks to promote ecological health and mitigate the drivers of biodiversity loss by addressing the interconnected challenges of climate change, pollution, and habitat destruction. These global initiatives highlight the urgency and necessity for collaborative efforts among governments, scientists, and communities to foster sustainable interaction with nature.

3. Economic and Financial Risks of Biodiversity Loss

  • 3-1. Valuation of ecosystem services

  • Ecosystem services, which encompass the natural processes and benefits provided by the environment, play a critical role in sustaining human livelihoods and economic activities. A recent report highlighted that over 50% of global GDP is significantly dependent on nature, indicating a potential $44 trillion economic risk tied to biodiversity loss. This valuation emphasizes the urgent need to recognize ecosystem services not simply as external benefits but as essential inputs for economic stability and growth. Valuing these services accurately allows policymakers and businesses to better understand the direct and indirect impacts of biodiversity degradation, aiding in informed decision-making and prioritization of conservation efforts.

  • 3-2. Corporate exposure and strategic gaps

  • Despite the evident financial risks associated with biodiversity loss, a stark gap persists in corporate readiness. Less than 5% of companies have formal biodiversity strategies in place, demonstrating a disconnect between the understanding of biodiversity-related risks and the implementation of strategies to manage them. The lack of strategic action is particularly concerning as biodiversity loss poses operational, regulatory, financial, and reputational threats. Companies that overlook these risks may face disruptions in supply chains, heightened regulatory scrutiny, and damage to their reputations. This gap invites a broader consideration of how businesses can shift from traditional risk management practices, which often neglect environmental factors, to holistic strategies that integrate biodiversity as a core component of long-term viability and profitability.

  • 3-3. Projected economic losses

  • The economic implications of biodiversity loss are becoming increasingly concerning, projecting significant losses across multiple sectors. Studies have shown that disruptions in ecosystem health can lead to severe financial repercussions, affecting resources crucial for industries such as agriculture, fisheries, and forestry. For example, the January 2025 wildfires in Southern California—exacerbated by biodiversity degradation—resulted in billions of dollars of agricultural losses and dislocated over 150, 000 residents. Such events underline the urgency of incorporating biodiversity considerations in capital planning and corporate risk assessment frameworks, ensuring that economic strategies account for potential ecological vulnerabilities. As investors demand more transparency regarding nature-related risks, the call for actionable insights and robust strategies to mitigate biodiversity-related financial exposures will only intensify.

4. Poverty, Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Interactions

  • 4-1. Link between poverty reduction and ecosystem health

  • The relationship between poverty reduction and ecosystem health is multifaceted, particularly in semi-arid landscapes where ecosystems are crucial to local economic vitality. Research indicates that biodiversity conservation plays a significant role in enhancing the overall well-being of communities dependent on natural resources. In these regions, natural ecosystems provide vital services such as food, clean water, and raw materials, which are essential for livelihood improvement. However, the link remains complex; while improved economic conditions can lead to reduced reliance on these ecosystems—potentially alleviating pressures on biodiversity—environmental degradation often occurs as a trade-off. Understanding this balance is vital for creating effective policies that marry economic growth with environmental stewardship.

  • 4-2. Spatial management in semi-arid landscapes

  • Spatial management strategies in semi-arid ecosystems recognize the critical intersection of poverty and biodiversity conservation. A recent analysis emphasizes that careful evaluation of spatial data can reveal the varied relationship between these factors, highlighting how certain local drivers—such as ecosystem productivity and governmental support—can foster biodiversity while simultaneously alleviating poverty. Insights from studies conducted in regions like Iran reveal that spatially explicit interventions targeting both economic and ecological drivers can effectively promote biodiversity preservation, ultimately resulting in enhanced livelihoods for communities. Policymakers are encouraged to adopt such integrated management frameworks to optimize the synergies between poverty reduction efforts and biodiversity conservation.

  • 4-3. Implications for vulnerable populations

  • The implications of biodiversity loss extend deeply into the lives of vulnerable populations, particularly those residing in rural and semi-arid areas. As biodiversity dwindles, the ecosystem services that these communities rely upon become increasingly compromised, leading to greater degrees of insecurity and poverty. The reliance of the impoverished on natural resources stems from their limited access to alternative means of livelihood; thus, biodiversity loss exacerbates existing socio-economic vulnerabilities. Furthermore, without adequate policy interventions that address the socio-economic and ecological concerns together, these communities may remain trapped in cycles of poverty and environmental degradation. Targeted conservation initiatives that also prioritize socio-economic development will be essential to break this cycle and ensure long-term sustainability.

5. Sectoral Impacts: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries

  • 5-1. Deforestation-driven job losses

  • Deforestation has emerged as a critical factor contributing to job losses within the agriculture and forestry sectors. With Nigeria losing approximately 350, 000 to 400, 000 hectares of forest each year, jobs linked directly to forestry management and sustainable practices are also vanishing. Subsistence farming, which accounts for over 70% of Nigeria's agricultural workforce, often leads to forest land being converted into agricultural fields. This shift not only reduces job opportunities in forested areas but also adversely affects those who depend on these ecosystems for their livelihoods, leading to increasing poverty among communities that rely on forestry.

  • 5-2. Effects on commodity supply chains

  • The impact of biodiversity loss reverberates throughout Nigeria's commodity supply chains, particularly in the agricultural sector. Deforestation disrupts the availability of various resources, resulting in higher prices and reduced access to essential goods. For instance, as forests are cleared, the supply of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) diminishes, affecting local economies and businesses dependent on these commodities. Additionally, reduced agricultural productivity due to soil erosion and climate instability exacerbates supply chain vulnerabilities, making markets more volatile. Stakeholders in the agricultural supply chain must address these challenges by implementing sustainable practices and fostering resilience in their operations.

  • 5-3. Broader rural economic effects

  • The socio-economic repercussions of biodiversity loss extend beyond immediate job and supply chain impacts; they have severe implications for the broader rural economy. As deforestation accelerates, communities facing the dual threats of food insecurity and diminishing natural resources experience heightened economic instability. The degradation of land not only reduces agricultural yields but also displaces rural populations, leading to increased migration towards urban areas, where job opportunities may be limited. Additionally, rural regions dependent on forest ecosystems are also at risk of conflict over dwindling resources, particularly as agricultural land becomes scarcer due to desertification. Comprehensive strategies, including policies that support sustainable land management and alternative livelihood programs, are critical to bolster economic stability in these vulnerable communities.

6. Policy and Multi-Stakeholder Responses

  • 6-1. Role of international observances

  • International observances play a vital role in raising awareness and fostering global action toward biodiversity conservation and sustainability. Events such as the United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP) emphasize the need for coordinated efforts by countries and organizations in addressing biodiversity loss. These events facilitate dialogue among nations, encourage sharing of best practices, and promote international agreements aimed at protecting ecosystems.

  • Recently, the push for stronger policies has been highlighted at various forums, signalling a growing recognition of the intersection between biodiversity loss and climate change. As nations increasingly experience adverse environmental changes, there has been a heightened urgency to recommit to international goals, such as those outlined in the Convention on Biological Diversity.

  • 6-2. Importance of stakeholder collaboration

  • Collaboration among diverse stakeholders is crucial in addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by biodiversity loss. This includes cooperation between governments, private sectors, non-governmental organizations, and local communities. The Minister of Environment in Nigeria recently emphasized this point, noting that effective collaboration among various stakeholders is essential to tackle climate change and its impact on biodiversity.

  • For instance, during an international conference in June 2025, stakeholders discussed the urgent need to address issues such as desertification and the related socio-economic impacts on regional livelihoods. By integrating efforts across sectors and involving communities directly impacted by biodiversity degradation, a more holistic and effective response to the crisis can be achieved.

  • 6-3. Emerging policy frameworks

  • Emerging policy frameworks are increasingly incorporating biodiversity considerations into broader environmental, economic, and developmental strategies. This shift is essential in addressing the root causes of biodiversity loss, as well as to mitigate its consequences on economies and communities.

  • New policies aim to integrate biodiversity protection into economic planning, ensuring that economic growth does not come at the expense of environmental degradation. The recent discussions in various policy forums suggest a movement toward frameworks that support sustainable practices, such as the promotion of circular economies that emphasize resource efficiency and ecosystem health.

  • As highlighted in recent ministerial comments, there is also a focus on research and technology as critical drivers of policy impact, demonstrating the need for continued innovation and stakeholder engagement to develop effective responses to biodiversity challenges.

7. Mitigation and Opportunities: The Role of Circular Economy

  • 7-1. Circular economy principles

  • The circular economy represents a transformative approach for businesses aiming to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency. By rethinking traditional linear production models, which typically follow a 'take, make, dispose' trajectory, organizations are encouraged to adopt practices that prioritize sustainability and environmental stewardship. This paradigm shift hinges on principles such as reducing consumption, reusing materials, and recycling waste back into the production cycle, allowing for the regeneration of natural systems. As articulated by Weslynne Ashton, who highlighted this in her conference presentation at the 2024 Leaders Who Make a Difference event, businesses can create long-term value not only for themselves but also for their communities and ecosystems through these principles. Companies around the world are actively exploring innovative materials and sustainable business models that embody these circular tenets, paving the way for healthier economic and environmental outcomes.

  • 7-2. Trade-offs and potential pitfalls

  • Despite the promise of the circular economy, it is essential to acknowledge the associated trade-offs and potential pitfalls. Transitioning from a linear to a circular model requires significant shifts in mindset, strategy, and operational practices. For instance, while adopting renewable materials and recycling practices can reduce waste and environmental impact, such initiatives may incur higher upfront costs and necessitate changes in supply chain logistics. Additionally, businesses must strive to ensure that their circular strategies do not unintentionally perpetuate social inequalities or environmental harm. The importance of aligning circular economy initiatives with principles of social and environmental justice cannot be overstated, as failing to address these dimensions risks exacerbating existing issues, particularly in communities that have been historically marginalized.

  • 7-3. Linkages to biodiversity recovery

  • The circular economy holds significant potential for bolstering biodiversity recovery efforts. By mitigating the excessive resource extraction commonly associated with linear economies, businesses can help preserve natural habitats and protect biodiversity. Practices such as sustainable sourcing of materials, regenerative agricultural methods, and waste reduction can enhance the resilience of ecosystems. Moreover, by focusing on circularity, industries can contribute to the restoration and regeneration of ecosystems that have been degraded due to overexploitation. The synthesis of the circular economy with biodiversity goals presents an opportunity for integrated solutions that not only promote economic viability but also foster healthy and diverse biological systems. This cross-pollination of objectives is critical as our global community navigates the dual challenges of economic sustainability and ecological preservation in the face of biodiversity loss.

Conclusion

  • In summary, the multifaceted challenges posed by biodiversity loss present a critical juncture for economic stability and environmental health. As indicated by the potential $44 trillion economic toll, the urgency for businesses to adopt formal biodiversity strategies cannot be overstated. Governments must also play a crucial role in fortifying policy frameworks that facilitate sustainable development and mitigate the intertwined threats of poverty and biodiversity loss, particularly in vulnerable regions.

  • Looking forward, the focus on cross-sector collaboration emerges as a promising avenue to create synergies between economic growth and ecosystem preservation. Instruments such as the circular economy illustrate a transformative potential, serving as a pathway to decouple economic advancement from environmental decline. Future actionable steps include encouraging corporate transparency regarding biodiversity dependencies, fostering targeted investments in restoration efforts, and scaling up circular resource initiatives that benefit both the environment and the economy.

  • To adapt effectively to these ongoing challenges, continuous monitoring, heightened stakeholder engagement, and governance adaptability are imperative. By aligning conservation efforts with socio-economic development, we stand at a pivotal moment to not only safeguard our planet's biodiversity but also ensure the prosperity of future generations. As we navigate these pressing issues, it is crucial for all sectors to embrace resilient practices that harmonize ecological integrity and economic vitality, ultimately securing a sustainable and equitable future.

Glossary

  • Biodiversity Loss: The decline in the variety of life on Earth, encompassing the extinction of species and the reduction of ecosystems. As of June 2025, around 1 million species are at risk of extinction, primarily due to factors such as habitat destruction and climate change, severely impacting ecological balance and human health.
  • Ecosystem Services: The benefits provided by natural environments to humans, including food production, clean water, and climate regulation. These services are crucial for human well-being and economic stability, with a significant portion of global GDP dependent on healthy ecosystems.
  • Circular Economy: An economic model that contrasts with the traditional linear economy by emphasizing the reduction, reuse, and recycling of resources. This approach aims to minimize waste, enhance resource efficiency, and promote sustainability, crucial in addressing biodiversity loss.
  • Deforestation: The large-scale removal of trees for land conversion and agricultural activities. As of 2025, deforestation significantly contributes to biodiversity loss, particularly in regions like Nigeria, where it leads to job losses in forestry and agriculture, compounding economic challenges for local communities.
  • Climate Change: Long-term alterations in temperature and weather patterns, largely driven by human activities like fossil fuel combustion. Climate change exacerbates biodiversity loss by disrupting habitats and species distributions, posing severe threats to global ecosystems by 2025.
  • Stakeholder Collaboration: The cooperative efforts among various parties, including governments, businesses, NGOs, and communities, to address shared challenges like biodiversity loss. Effective collaboration is highlighted as essential for developing integrated policies that promote sustainable development and ecological health.
  • International Day for Biological Diversity: Observed annually on May 22, this UN initiative aims to raise awareness and promote action for biodiversity conservation. The 2025 theme, 'Harmony With Nature and Sustainable Development, ' underscores the urgency of aligning biodiversity efforts with sustainable practices.
  • Socio-economic Vulnerabilities: The economic and social challenges faced by communities, particularly in semi-arid regions, that can be exacerbated by biodiversity loss. These vulnerabilities can trap communities in cycles of poverty and environmental degradation without effective policy intervention.
  • Corporate Risk: The potential for financial losses faced by businesses due to environmental factors, including biodiversity loss. By June 2025, less than 5% of companies have formal biodiversity strategies, highlighting a gap in recognizing and managing these risks.
  • Poverty Traps: Situations where individuals or communities remain in poverty due to insufficient resources, compounded by ecological degradation. Biodiversity loss can jeopardize the livelihoods of vulnerable populations, making it harder for them to escape poverty.
  • Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: An international agreement aimed at reversing biodiversity decline by 2050, emphasizing the need for ambitious targets and strategies to protect ecosystems. This framework has gained prominence as a key response to the ongoing biodiversity crisis.
  • Valuation of Ecosystem Services: The process of assigning economic value to the benefits provided by ecosystems. Accurately valuing these services is becoming more critical as over 50% of global GDP is linked to nature, with potential economic risks of $44 trillion associated with biodiversity loss.

Source Documents