Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Powering the Future: Global Trends and Innovations in Nuclear Energy

General Report May 1, 2025
goover

  • As of May 1, 2025, the landscape of nuclear energy is at a critical juncture, characterized by both significant advancements and ongoing challenges. The global capacity of nuclear energy is projected to rise from 395 GW in 2024 to nearly 500 GW by 2035, underscoring the essential role nuclear power plays in addressing climate change and energy security. This anticipated increase is fueled by heightened demand for low-carbon energy sources and the urgency to achieve decarbonization goals globally. A comprehensive analysis reveals that nuclear electricity generation is set to escalate from approximately 2,616 TWh in 2024 to 3,410 TWh by 2035, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of roughly 2%. This growth suggests a strong alignment between the operational strategies of advanced economies, particularly in Asia, which are investing in both extending the lifespan of existing reactors and developing new nuclear fleets to support burgeoning energy demands.

  • A significant focus has been placed on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), with forecasts projecting the SMR market to expand from an estimated $6.1 billion in 2025 to approximately $7.7 billion by 2032—a CAGR of about 4.78%. These modular systems offer a more adaptable and cost-effective solution to energy production, particularly suited for regions where large nuclear power plants may not be viable. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act has been pivotal in reshaping investment landscapes in nuclear, prompting renewed interest in domestic uranium reserves, and driving capital flows towards SMR projects. Furthermore, the legal and regulatory challenges posed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continue to stir debate, as states and startups seek to challenge restrictive policies that prolong project timelines and inhibit innovation.

  • Additionally, the growing interplay between nuclear energy and emerging sectors—such as powering data centers—exemplifies nuclear’s evolving application within the energy landscape. The prospects for nuclear energy to meet the exponential electricity demand from data centers, while ensuring grid resilience, reinforces its strategic importance moving forward. This report articulates a holistic overview of nuclear energy's trajectory, examining capacity trends, innovative technologies, policies influencing investment, market outlooks, regulatory hurdles, and broader industrial applications.

Global Capacity Trends and Resource Foundations

  • Forecast of global nuclear capacity growth to 494 GW by 2035

  • As of May 1, 2025, global nuclear capacity is projected to reach 494 GW by 2035, marking a significant increase from 395 GW in 2024. This growth is largely driven by heightened demands for low-carbon energy sources amid climate change concerns and the need for energy security. According to a recent report from GlobalData, nuclear electricity generation is expected to expand from 2,616 TWh in 2024 to 3,410 TWh by 2035, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2%. Such growth underscores nuclear power's critical role in the global energy transition, fueling discussions around its viability as a sustainable energy source.

  • Notably, advanced economies are focusing on extending the operational lifespan of existing reactors while also investing in new nuclear fleets—particularly in Asia, where demand is surging. The significant developments in reactor technologies, including small modular reactors (SMRs), play an essential part in this strategy, showcasing the industry's adaptability in addressing modern energy challenges.

  • Share of nuclear power in G20 electricity generation

  • In 2023, the share of nuclear power in G20 countries presented a diverse landscape, showcasing varying degrees of reliance on nuclear energy for electricity generation. For instance, France leads with an impressive 65% of its total electricity derived from nuclear sources, a trend established since the oil crises of the 1970s which pushed the nation towards energy independence through nuclear investments. Other countries also demonstrate significant nuclear reliance, though with notable differences in integration and public perception.

  • Countries like Ukraine and Slovakia have also embraced nuclear energy as a cornerstone of their electricity production. Ukraine, with a nuclear share of 50%, continues to prioritize nuclear power despite historical tensions and challenges. This dynamic landscape illustrates the evolving role of nuclear energy within G20 nations, reflecting broader energy security and decarbonization strategies that are critical for meeting their ambitious climate goals.

  • Uranium resources and mining resurgence in Wyoming

  • Wyoming's role in the uranium mining sector is experiencing a noteworthy resurgence as the state capitalizes on its rich uranium ore reserves—the largest in the U.S. Historically, Wyoming's uranium industry faced decline due to falling demand and competition from cheaper foreign sources. However, as of 2024, the market landscape is shifting, bolstered by domestic policy changes that favor increased local production, particularly following the U.S. ban on Russian uranium imports.

  • A significant driver for this resurgence has been the Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy (ADVANCE) Act, enacted in July 2024, which promotes the development and commercialization of advanced nuclear technologies. This legislative environment encourages exploration and production of uranium to support future nuclear projects, such as TerraPower's advanced sodium-cooled reactor in Kemmerer, which is poised to redefine nuclear engagement in the region. With a 2025 operational timeline projected, this and similar initiatives promise not only local economic benefits but also contribute substantially to the national goal of sustainable energy independence.

Emerging Role of Small Modular Reactors

  • SMR market forecast: $6.09 billion in 2025 to $7.70 billion by 2032

  • The Small Modular Reactor (SMR) market is projected to grow significantly from an estimated value of $6.09 billion in 2025 to approximately $7.70 billion by 2032. This expansion reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 4.78%. The surge in demand is attributed to the need for cleaner energy sources in response to global decarbonization efforts. SMRs are recognized for their ability to provide flexible and reliable energy solutions, particularly in regions where large nuclear power plants may not be feasible due to economic or geographical constraints.

  • SMRs are designed for mass production, facilitating economies of scale and shorter construction timeframes. Their modular nature allows multiple reactors to be built in factories and then transported to sites where they can be assembled, thereby offering a cost-effective solution for energy generation. As more countries pursue net-zero emissions targets, the role of SMRs in diversifying energy portfolios is expected to become increasingly significant, contributing to energy security and sustainability.

  • Projected CAGR of 4.78% for modular nuclear construction

  • The projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.78% for SMRs indicates a robust future for modular nuclear construction. This growth is driven by a combination of factors including technological advancements, favorable governmental policies, and a growing acceptance of nuclear power as a viable energy alternative. As nations globally aim to decrease dependency on fossil fuels and increase their share of low-carbon sources, SMRs are well-positioned to complement renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar.

  • With governments enhancing their support and investments in SMR technology, the market is set to witness an influx of innovations aimed at improving safety and efficiency. Continued research and development efforts will be critical in achieving scale, thereby lowering production costs and enhancing the commercial viability of SMRs. The alignment of these advancements with contemporary energy needs underscores the emerging role of SMRs in the global energy landscape.

  • Strategic considerations for SMR cost-competitiveness

  • The journey towards achieving cost-competitiveness for Small Modular Reactors involves several strategic considerations. To compete effectively with large-scale nuclear facilities, renewables, and fossil fuel sources, SMRs must not only innovate technologically but also ensure regulatory compliance and public acceptance. Significant investments in research and development (R&D) are necessary, focusing on modular designs that enhance safety and reduce costs.

  • Additionally, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and other governmental bodies play a crucial role in providing the necessary funding and support to facilitate the growth of the SMR sector. Streamlined regulatory processes will be vital to minimize delays and reduce compliance costs, which currently hinder rapid deployment. As SMR technologies mature and begin to demonstrate operational efficiency and reliability on a commercial scale, achieving price and performance parity with existing energy sources will become increasingly attainable. Market dynamics will also require ongoing evaluation to adapt to changing consumer expectations and global energy prices.

Policy Drivers and Investment Framework

  • Impact of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act on nuclear financing

  • The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) marked a significant transformation in the financial landscape for nuclear energy in the United States, establishing technology-neutral tax credits designed to stimulate investment across various renewable and low-carbon energy sources. Among these, nuclear energy—often associated with longer construction and pre-construction timelines—has emerged as a critical beneficiary. The IRA includes provisions such as the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) that are anticipated to facilitate capital flow into nuclear projects by effectively reducing their levelized cost of energy (LCOE) and enhancing their competitiveness against other generation technologies. As of May 1, 2025, stakeholders in the nuclear sector are actively strategizing to leverage these tax incentives to accelerate construction and commercialization of new nuclear facilities, fostering a burgeoning energy landscape that seeks to address the country’s growing electricity demands.

  • Technology-neutral tax credits fueling new projects

  • The IRA's technology-neutral approach has opened avenues for innovation and investment in nuclear projects that were previously constrained by financial barriers and regulatory challenges. Under the IRA, any carbon-free electricity generation technology qualifies for tax credits, which significantly includes nuclear energy. Estimates suggest that a substantial percentage of the ITC outlays could be directed toward nuclear energy in the upcoming years, particularly as public sector initiatives align to support the ambitions of tripling global nuclear capacity. With the prospect of achieving up to 15 GW of new nuclear capacity by 2030, the significance of these tax credits cannot be understated. They not only provide a critical financial cushion for developers but also represent a shift in national energy policy that acknowledges nuclear’s essential role in achieving a low-carbon future.

  • Overview of nuclear industry structure and investment dynamics

  • The nuclear energy sector operates within a complex ecosystem that includes various stakeholders—ranging from government entities and regulatory agencies to private sector investors and technology developers. Currently, the industry’s structure is characterized by a mix of established utilities and emerging players dedicated to the development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and advanced reactor designs. Investment dynamics within this evolving landscape indicate a concerted effort by public and private sectors to collaborate, addressing key challenges such as high capital costs and lengthy permitting processes. As evidenced by the growth of nuclear-focused equities amidst a backdrop of renewed interest in energy independence and climate change mitigation, market confidence in the nuclear sector is expected to foster increased capital influx, thereby propelling future projects and international collaborations.

Market and Financial Perspectives

  • Vistra Corp.’s positioning among top nuclear energy stocks

  • As of May 1, 2025, Vistra Corp. has emerged as a prominent player in the nuclear energy sector, positioned favorably among the best nuclear energy stocks according to billionaire investors. With nuclear energy accounting for nearly 10% of global electricity supply, and over 19% of the U.S. electricity in 2024, Vistra's operations align with the growing demand for sustainable energy sources. The International Energy Agency reports that more than 70 GW of new nuclear capacity is under construction, indicating a robust future market for companies like Vistra, especially amidst increasing pressure to meet global decarbonization goals. In an environment marked by rising electricity demand—especially driven by increasing needs from data centers—Vistra's focus on nuclear energy underscores its commitment to sustainability. Recent engagement from tech giants supporting nuclear expansion solidifies confidence in potential future profits from this energy source. It is crucial to highlight that while Vistra benefits from the current momentum, it also faces challenges inherent in the nuclear sector, such as construction timelines, regulatory hurdles, and fluctuating uranium prices.

  • Billionaire investment trends in nuclear equities

  • Recent trends indicate a marked interest among billionaire investors in nuclear equities, reflective of their recognition of nuclear energy's pivotal role in achieving net-zero emissions. Major investment strategies now prioritize firms that are poised to benefit from the ongoing evolution of nuclear technology and market dynamics. The surge in investments comes amid significant fluctuations in uranium prices, which have fallen approximately 37% since January 2024, influenced by geopolitical tensions and potential shifts in sanction policies against uranium-rich nations. Despite these fluctuations, the long-term outlook for nuclear equities remains buoyed by expectations for a substantial increase in nuclear capacity globally. Additionally, investors are showing increasing confidence in small modular reactors (SMRs)—an area that can provide more rapid returns on investment due to shorter construction times and reduced costs. As billionaire investments flow into nuclear equities, they are leveraging the anticipated growth trajectory of nuclear energy as a key player in the transition to sustainable energy solutions.

Regulatory and Legal Challenges

  • States and Startups Suing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • The legal landscape surrounding nuclear energy in the United States is increasingly contentious, as several states and nuclear startups have initiated lawsuits against the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This surge in litigation is driven by allegations that the NRC's regulatory framework imposes excessively stringent requirements that hinder the development of new nuclear projects, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs). For instance, the startup Valar Atomics has asserted that burdensome regulations compel it to pursue reactor development overseas rather than within the U.S., which traditionally led the world in nuclear energy deployment. In early April 2025, Valar Atomics joined forces with Deep Fission and states including Florida, Louisiana, and Arizona to advance a lawsuit originally filed in December 2024 by Texas, Utah, and another company, Last Energy. The central claim is that the NRC's regulatory practices are so restrictive that they effectively stall new nuclear reactor construction nationwide. This legal action highlights a broader frustration with the NRC's lengthy permitting processes, which critics argue have caused only three reactors to come online in the last quarter-century, all beset by delays and budget overruns. In contrast, countries like China and South Korea have been rapidly advancing their nuclear programs, raising concerns over U.S. competitiveness in nuclear technology and innovation.

  • The plaintiffs contend that the NRC is misinterpreting the Atomic Energy Act, which was designed to regulate facilities using significant quantities of nuclear material. They argue that SMRs, which produce less energy and are inherently safer, should not be subject to the same onerous licensing processes as larger reactors. The lawsuit's advocates emphasize that innovation, which has been stymied by regulatory delays, is crucial for maintaining safety and efficiency in the nuclear sector.

  • Current public sentiment around nuclear power is at its highest level in 15 years, offering a potent backdrop to these legal challenges. As new nuclear startups emerge—with significant private investment flowing into the sector—the pressure mounts on regulatory bodies to adapt and facilitate a more proactive approach to nuclear technology development. Nonetheless, the path ahead is fraught with the complexities of balancing safety, regulatory integrity, and technological advancement.

  • Progress and Stakes of Ongoing NRC Litigation

  • As of May 1, 2025, the litigation against the NRC represents a critical juncture for the future of nuclear energy in the United States. The contentious nature of the relationship between nuclear companies and the NRC has been characterized as 'legalistic and adversarial', suggesting an environment where regulatory compliance often takes precedence over innovation. The NRC has recognized the increasing legal scrutiny and its implications for the sector. The agency has publicly acknowledged the need for efficiency in its licensing processes, asserting that efforts have been implemented to streamline operations. This comes in light of legislative reforms initiated under previous administrations, aimed at modernizing NRC practices to better accommodate advanced nuclear technologies. However, stakeholders within the industry remain skeptical about whether these changes will be sufficient to curb the lengthy delays that have plagued nuclear project development. Critics point out that while the NRC may have made strides toward efficiency, existing challenges—and the bureaucratic inertia—must be addressed substantively rather than through surface-level reforms. For the startups involved in the lawsuits, the outcomes carry significant implications. Should the courts rule in favor of the plaintiffs, it could pave the way for a reformed regulatory framework that fosters innovation and accelerates the development of SMRs. Conversely, a ruling that upholds current NRC practices may signal to new entrants that the U.S. market remains fraught with regulatory obstacles, potentially deterring future investments and technological advancements in nuclear energy.

  • In summary, as the litigation progresses, the stakes remain high—not only for the involved parties but also for the broader trajectory of nuclear energy in America. The outcome of these legal challenges will have lasting repercussions for regulatory frameworks, market dynamics, and ultimately, the United States' position in the global nuclear energy landscape.

Industrial Applications and Innovation

  • Nuclear energy’s role in powering data center expansion

  • As the electric power sector grapples with soaring demand from data centers, nuclear energy is increasingly seen as a viable solution. Data centers are forecasted to drive energy consumption to unprecedented levels—potentially multiplying their electricity demand by five-fold by 2035, reaching an estimated 176 GW. This steep rise emphasizes the urgency for reliable and clean energy sources, where nuclear power, which provided over 19% of the United States' electricity in 2024, presents significant advantages. A critical advantage of nuclear energy lies in its ability to provide reliable baseload power, operating continuously, irrespective of external factors such as weather conditions. With a capacity factor exceeding 92.5%, nuclear facilities outperform alternative sources like natural gas and renewables. This reliability is essential for data centers, where maintaining uninterrupted operations is pivotal for maximizing investments, particularly for advanced applications like artificial intelligence (AI). Moreover, the high energy density of nuclear fuel means that a relatively small amount can produce vast quantities of electricity, resulting in lower storage and transportation needs. This efficiency not only minimizes a nuclear power plant's physical footprint but also furthers sustainability goals, thereby aiding data center operators looking to optimize their energy supply while reducing environmental impacts. Deloitte's analysis suggests that the integration of new nuclear capacity could potentially meet approximately 10% of the anticipated surge in data center power needs over the next decade, contingent on significant expansions in nuclear capacity, estimated between 35 GW and 62 GW. This suggests a proactive approach is required to streamline nuclear development and execution as part of broader energy transition strategies.

  • Prospects for nuclear-backed grid stability and AI-driven demand

  • Nuclear power is uniquely positioned to contribute to grid stability amidst a rapidly changing energy landscape characterized by the increasing need for flexible, scalable energy solutions. With data centers becoming integral to modern economies—fueling sectors from cloud computing to AI development—having a stable and clean source of energy is paramount. The rise of AI-driven applications compounds this demand surge, leading to fluctuating power needs that classic power generation sources may struggle to accommodate. Nuclear energy's capability to deliver consistent output helps stabilize grids, particularly when paired with smart technologies that manage energy flows dynamically. This flexibility allows for significant synergies with renewable sources, which may be variable, thus enhancing overall system resilience. Furthermore, the development of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) stands to revolutionize nuclear’s role in providing such support. Unlike traditional large-scale reactors, SMRs can be deployed more rapidly and in a more adaptable manner, potentially filling gaps in renewable generation and supporting peak demand scenarios. Furthermore, collaborative efforts between industry stakeholders—technology firms, nuclear developers, and innovative financial models—can facilitate accelerated deployment, making nuclear a pivotal element in shaping future grid strategies. As such, addressing regulatory and public perception hurdles will be crucial to harnessing the full potential of nuclear energy within the context of modern energy applications, including high-demand sectors driven by AI.

Wrap Up

  • In conclusion, as of May 1, 2025, the trajectory of nuclear energy bridges significant past milestones with forward-looking aspirations. The burgeoning global capacity of nuclear power, alongside resilient uranium resource bases, reinforces its potential as a reliable baseload energy source. The growth of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) is notably crucial, offering scalable solutions that can be tailored for specific markets, alongside promising export opportunities. Policy initiatives, particularly the Inflation Reduction Act, have catalyzed substantial capital investments; however, the sustained momentum of this growth depends critically on overcoming regulatory challenges and fostering collaborative engagement between public and private sectors.

  • The financial community is increasingly cognizant of the evolving landscape, with nuclear assets and equities garnering heightened attention amid the push for sustainable energy solutions. Moreover, innovative applications of nuclear technology in high-demand sectors, notably data centers, are beginning to reshape perceptions and utilization of nuclear energy. To fully actualize the pivotal role of nuclear energy within global net-zero strategies, it is essential for stakeholders to synchronize technology advancement with policy predictability, bolster investment in workforce development and supply chains, and effectively navigate legal complexities that impede progress. The path forward appears promising yet challenging, with opportunities for accelerated commercialization of SMRs, development of advanced reactor designs specifically for integration with data centers, and global partnerships that harness both resource capabilities and creative financing avenues, ultimately contributing to a sustainable energy future.

Glossary

  • Nuclear Energy: A form of energy produced through nuclear reactions, particularly fission, which releases a significant amount of energy from atomic nuclei. It serves as a sustainable baseload power source critical for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and meeting global electricity demands.
  • Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): Compact nuclear reactors designed for mass production, enabling flexible deployment and shorter construction times. SMRs range from 50 to 300 MW in capacity and are considered cost-effective alternatives to traditional large nuclear plants, particularly suitable for regions lacking infrastructure.
  • Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): A landmark U.S. legislative act enacted in 2022 aimed at promoting renewable energy through technology-neutral tax credits. It has significant implications for nuclear energy financing by providing incentives that enhance the competitiveness of low-carbon energy projects.
  • Global Capacity: The total amount of electricity-generating capability from nuclear power worldwide, measured in gigawatts (GW). As of May 1, 2025, this capacity is projected to rise significantly, reflecting increased reliance on nuclear energy to combat climate change.
  • Uranium: A dense radioactive metal used as fuel in nuclear reactors to produce energy through fission. The resurgence of domestic uranium mining, particularly in the U.S., is driven by policy changes and rising demand for nuclear power.
  • Regulatory Challenges: Obstacles faced by nuclear projects due to complex regulatory frameworks governing the nuclear industry, particularly in the U.S. Bodies like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) enforce stringent licensing processes which can delay project timelines and innovation.
  • Data Centers: Facilities that house computer systems and associated components, such as telecommunications and storage systems. With increasing electricity demands, data centers are exploring nuclear energy as a reliable and low-emission power source.
  • Vistra Corp.: A major player in the U.S. energy sector focusing on sustainable energy sources, including nuclear power. As of May 1, 2025, Vistra is recognized among top nuclear energy stocks amid growing investments in clean energy technologies.
  • G20: An international forum of 19 countries and the European Union that collectively addresses global economic issues, including energy security and climate change. The G20 countries have varying degrees of reliance on nuclear energy in their electricity generation.
  • Energy Policy: Strategic governmental frameworks that dictate how energy is produced, consumed, and regulated within a country. Recent policies have increasingly favored nuclear energy as part of broader climate change and energy independence initiatives.
  • Market Forecast: Predictions regarding the performance and growth of nuclear energy markets, including the anticipated rise of SMRs and overall nuclear generation capacity, influenced by technological advancements and policy environments.
  • Industry Investment: Financial resources allocated towards developing, improving, and expanding nuclear energy infrastructure and technologies. Investments are influenced by factors such as market forecasts, government policies, and evolving energy demands.

Source Documents