Your browser does not support JavaScript!

Comparative Analysis of Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50

GOOVER DAILY REPORT 6/6/2024
goover

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Introduction
  2. Overview
  3. Vehicle Specifications
  4. Design and Styling
  5. Performance Metrics
  6. Range and Charging
  7. Price and Value
  8. Additional Features and Considerations
  9. User Experience and Market Perception
  10. Glossary
  11. Conclusion
  12. Source Documents

1. Introduction

  • This report provides a detailed comparative analysis of the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50, two prominent electric vehicles in the current market, based on collected data and reviews.

2. Overview

  • 2-1. Introduction to the Electric Vehicle Market

  • The electric vehicle market is becoming increasingly competitive, offering consumers a range of models that combine high technology, impressive performance, and respect for the environment. This competitive landscape has given rise to models like the Tesla Model 3 Performance (M3P) and the BMW i4 M50, which are among the most coveted electric vehicles available today.

  • 2-2. Significance of the Comparison

  • Among various electric vehicle options, the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 stand out due to their unique attributes and consumer appeal. Conducting a comparison of these two models is significant as it aids consumers in making informed decisions by highlighting critical aspects such as performance metrics, technological advancements, price points, and other essential features. Through this analysis, prospective buyers can better understand the strengths and weaknesses of each model, tailoring their choices to their individual needs and preferences.

3. Vehicle Specifications

  • 3-1. Vehicle Platforms and Variants

  • The Tesla Model 3 is available in three variations: Standard Range+ (entry-level), Long Range, and Performance. In contrast, the BMW i4 has two options: the entry-level eDrive40 and the faster M50. Tesla, being dedicated solely to electric vehicles (EVs), constructs its cars on an exclusive EV platform, enabling maximized electric performance without compromises. On the other hand, BMW, with its history in combustion engines, uses a more flexible platform for the i4, which supports both electric and combustion engines. This fundamental difference influences the build and design of the two vehicles significantly.

  • 3-2. Battery Sizes and Capacities

  • The Tesla Model 3's battery sizes vary with its different models. The entry-level Model 3 is equipped with a 57.5 kWh battery, whereas the Long Range and Performance variants feature a 75 kWh battery. BMW's i4 models use an 81.5 kWh net battery capacity. While BMW uses a single consistent battery size for the i4, Tesla does not officially disclose battery sizes and continuously updates the capacity with small improvements. The estimated real-world range of both Long Range and Performance Model 3 variants is close to 300 miles, with slight variations based on driving conditions. The BMW i4 M50 claims a range of about 245 miles, but independent reviews suggest that practical ranges might align closely, considering Tesla's more efficient energy usage. Charging capabilities for both brands are robust, with Tesla's Model 3 supporting up to 210 kW DC fast charging and BMW's i4 supporting up to 200 kW DC fast charging. Tesla's widespread Supercharger network enhances its charging convenience for users.

4. Design and Styling

  • 4-1. Exterior Design Comparison

  • The exterior designs of the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 reflect distinct philosophies. The BMW i4 M50 is designed with traditional German automotive styling, closely resembling its combustion-engine 4 series counterparts. It features aggressive styling elements that distinguish it as a performance-oriented vehicle. In contrast, the Tesla Model 3 Performance has a more aerodynamic and minimalist design, characterized by a simpler and cleaner look. The lower front end and gradually rising profile give it a sleek appearance optimized for aerodynamics. While the BMW's styling is aggressive and familiar to brand enthusiasts, Tesla focuses on a modern, wind-tunnel-inspired aesthetic.

  • 4-2. Interior Design Comparison

  • The interiors of the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 reveal significant differences in design philosophy and material usage. The BMW i4 M50 maintains a traditional luxury feel with a long, curved screen across the dash, plusher materials, and more tactile buttons. The Tesla Model 3 Performance, on the other hand, embraces a futuristic and minimalist approach, featuring a prominent rectangular screen and a lack of physical buttons, contributing to a streamlined cabin environment. The BMW's interior emphasizes familiarity and luxury, with soft leathers and conventional layout, while Tesla's is more modern, with an airy ambiance thanks to its expansive glass roof and minimalist design.

5. Performance Metrics

  • 5-1. Power and Torque

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance is equipped with a 510 horsepower (hp) engine, providing a torque of 741 Newton-meters (Nm). On the other hand, the BMW i4 M50 boasts 536 horsepower and a higher torque of 794 Nm. Both cars feature all-wheel drive (AWD), which enhances their grip and performance on various types of roads.

  • 5-2. Acceleration Times

  • In terms of acceleration, the Tesla Model 3 Performance can go from 0 to 62 mph in 3.3 seconds. The BMW i4 M50, despite its slightly higher power output, takes 3.9 seconds to achieve the same acceleration. These times are indicative of the fast performance capabilities that both vehicles offer.

  • 5-3. Top Speed

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance reaches a top speed of 162 mph (262 km/h). Conversely, the BMW i4 M50 has a lower top speed of 130 mph (209 km/h). This difference highlights the emphasis on high-speed performance in the Tesla Model 3 Performance.

6. Range and Charging

  • 6-1. Range Comparison

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance (M3P) offers a better range of 476 km (approximately 296 miles), compared to 433 km (approximately 269 miles) for the BMW i4 M50. This information is confirmed by the specification data provided in the documents which cite these values explicitly. Furthermore, real-world estimates suggest that both cars are good for around 300 miles, although the slightly higher capacity of the BMW's battery (81.5 kWh vs. Tesla's claimed 82 kWh) does not significantly translate into greater range primarily due to the more efficient design of Tesla's electric system. The Tesla Model 3 is seen to leverage its efficiency to extract more mileage from its battery.

  • 6-2. Charging Capabilities

  • When it comes to charging, the two vehicles show comparable specifications with slight differences. Both the Tesla Model 3 and the BMW i4 M50 offer robust charging options. For AC charging, both can handle up to 11 kW. However, for DC fast charging, the Model 3 Performance can reach up to 250 kW while the i4 M50 peaks at 200 kW. Notably, the Tesla Supercharger network is highlighted as an advantage, providing easier access and potentially faster charging sessions. Despite the minor differences in peak DC charging rates, both vehicles can replenish their batteries quickly, but the Tesla is generally favored for its charging efficiency and network superiority.

7. Price and Value

  • 7-1. Price Comparison

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 are priced differently, catering to various segments in the electric vehicle market. According to the data, the Tesla Model 3 Performance is approximately €50,500 ($56,990 in the US) while the BMW i4 M50 is around €68,700 ($65,900 in the US). This makes the BMW notably more expensive by almost $10,000 in comparison.

  • 7-2. Features Relative to Cost

  • Both vehicles offer unique features relative to their costs. Despite being cheaper, the Tesla Model 3 Performance offers a range of 310 miles, a quicker 0-62mph acceleration time of 3.1 seconds, and the advantage of Tesla's Supercharger network. The model also benefits from a larger trunk space and additional front trunk. While the BMW i4 M50 is more expensive, it presents a premium finish with a variety of high-quality materials, a lift hatch, active air suspension, and adjustable dampening. Additionally, it has a towing capacity of 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs), an option not available for the Tesla Model 3 in the United States. In essence, the Model 3 Performance offers more value for a lower cost, while the i4 M50 targets those looking for luxury and additional features.

8. Additional Features and Considerations

  • 8-1. Suspension Systems

  • Both the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 feature adaptive suspensions that ensure a comfortable and responsive ride adapted to varying road conditions. The BMW i4 M50 offers the additional advantage of an active air suspension with adjustable dampening, enhancing the driving experience by allowing customization based on driving conditions and driver preferences.

  • 8-2. Cargo and Storage Space

  • In terms of cargo and storage space, the Tesla Model 3 Performance provides 648 liters of loading capacity, which is more than the BMW i4 M50's 470 liters. Additionally, the Tesla has a front trunk, adding to its overall storage capacity. On the other hand, the BMW i4 M50 includes a bigger hatchback trunk, which might appeal to different consumer needs.

  • 8-3. Towing Capacity

  • The BMW i4 M50 comes standard with a towing option available in all markets, rated at 1,600 kg (approximately 3,527 lbs). In contrast, the Tesla Model 3 does not offer a towing option in the United States, although it is available in Europe. This gives the BMW i4 M50 an edge for consumers who require towing capabilities.

9. User Experience and Market Perception

  • 9-1. Customer Reviews and Preferences

  • Based on collected data and reviews, customer opinions on the Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 highlight distinct preferences. The Tesla Model 3 is often lauded for its technological superiority and minimalist design, with a particular emphasis on efficiency and futuristic appeal. Conversely, the BMW i4 M50 is appreciated for its luxury, traditional design cues, and familiar premium German car feel. Many BMW enthusiasts prefer the i4 M50’s plush interior with soft leathers, curved screens, and conventional button placements. These reviews suggest that the market for these electric vehicles is segmented between technology-driven buyers and those who favor luxury and traditional automotive values.

  • 9-2. Technological Superiority

  • In terms of technological advancements, the Tesla Model 3 Performance shows a marked edge over the BMW i4 M50. Reviews indicate that the Tesla Model 3 incorporates a sophisticated software interface, unmatched in its seamless integration and user experience. The vehicle’s minimalist design, dominated by a central touchscreen, enhances this technological aura. Additionally, the access to Tesla's Supercharger network is a significant advantage, providing faster charging speeds and wider availability. On the other hand, the BMW i4 M50 offers features such as an active air suspension and adjustable dampening which are appreciated in traditional combustion-engine vehicles and add to its appeal. However, in comparison, the Tesla Model 3 is recognized for better efficiency, faster charging, and more extensive technological features, making it a prefered choice among tech-savvy consumers.

10. Glossary

  • 10-1. Tesla Model 3 Performance [Electric Vehicle]

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance is a high-performance electric vehicle known for its rapid acceleration, superior range, and comprehensive Supercharger network, making it a strong contender in the electric vehicle market.

  • 10-2. BMW i4 M50 [Electric Vehicle]

  • The BMW i4 M50 is a luxury electric performance sedan that combines BMW's renowned driving dynamics with electric efficiency, characterized by its high torque, elegant design, and advanced suspension system.

11. Conclusion

  • The Tesla Model 3 Performance and BMW i4 M50 cater to different segments of the electric vehicle market. While the Model 3 leans towards efficiency and technological advancement, the i4 M50 emphasizes luxury and traditional automotive values, offering consumers compelling choices based on their preferences and needs.

12. Source Documents